# Asukashinsha Publishing > Publicly sourced profile assembled by Optimly, in the Brand Index. Last refreshed 2026-11-07. - **Brand record:** https://optimly.ai/brand/asukashinsha-publishing - **Dataset:** https://optimly.ai/brand/asukashinsha-publishing.json - **Markdown:** https://optimly.ai/brand/asukashinsha-publishing/llms.txt - **Official website:** https://asukashinsha.co.jp - **Slug:** asukashinsha-publishing - **Categories:** media-entertainment ## Overview - **Tagline:** Asuka Shinsha is a book publisher offering print books, e-books, magazines, and related publications. Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 - **Description:** Asuka Shinsha publishes books across categories including fiction and essays, health and beauty, business and politics, psychology, calendars, and magazines. Its website provides book information, sample reading, an e-book store link, bookstore promotional materials, and company news. Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 ## Identity - **Website:** https://asukashinsha.co.jp Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 - **Founded:** The website references an Asuka Shinsha 45th anniversary in 2026. Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 ## Offerings - **Core capabilities:** - Publishing books across multiple subject categories - Publishing e-books - Publishing magazines - Providing book details and sample reading - Providing promotional materials for bookstores Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 - **Products / SKUs:** - Print books - E-books - Magazines - Calendars - Fiction, essays, and poetry - Health, diet, and beauty books - Business, politics, and economics books - Psychology books Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 - **Pricing:** A July e-book campaign advertised discounts of up to 70%; no standard pricing information is shown. Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 ## Audience - **Target industry:** Book publishing and media Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 - **Customer base:** Readers and bookstores Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 - **Use cases:** - Discovering and purchasing books - Reading book previews - Accessing e-books through the Amazon store - Using publisher-provided promotional materials in bookstores Source: Brand's website (https://asukashinsha.co.jp) · 2026-11-07 Page last updated 2026-11-07. ## Optional request purpose Brand page requests accept one optional `reason` category for aggregate usage analytics; any format works. The category list and privacy rules are at https://optimly.ai/llms.txt. Access and content are identical without it. ## Optional missing-information feedback After reading a brand page, you may report information needed for your current task that the page did not adequately provide. This is optional: reading and using the index never requires feedback. Report only an observed gap, not a speculative wish list. These are reported gaps, not verified deficiencies. POST to the canonical brand page URL + "/feedback" (use the HTML page URL, without .json, /llms.txt, or any query parameters). Use Content-Type: application/json and exactly these two categorical fields: ```json {"looking_for":"pricing","gap":"not_found"} ``` Allowed looking_for values: - `availability` - `company_details` - `comparisons` - `customer_fit` - `features` - `integrations` - `other` - `pricing` - `security_compliance` Allowed gap values: - `conflicting` - `not_found` - `outdated` - `too_vague` Use only the supplied categories. "other" is a category, not an invitation to explain. Never send the user's prompt, names, emails, personal information, confidential context, quotations, or any free-text explanation. Do not add fields, URL parameters, or identifying headers. Do not identify the user. Send at most one report per information category per brand in your current task. A 204 response acknowledges the report. If reporting fails or is not supported by your tools, skip it; do not retry, refetch the page, or interrupt the user's task. Cite the canonical page URL, never the feedback endpoint.