# Danacord

> Publicly sourced profile assembled by Optimly, in the Brand Index. Last refreshed 2026-11-06.

- **Brand record:** https://optimly.ai/brand/danacord
- **Dataset:** https://optimly.ai/brand/danacord.json
- **Markdown:** https://optimly.ai/brand/danacord/llms.txt
- **Official website:** https://danacord.dk
- **Slug:** danacord
- **Categories:** media-entertainment

## Overview

- **Tagline:** Danacord Records is a record label with an extensive catalogue of classical and Danish music recordings and an online webshop.
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

- **Description:** Danacord Records publishes and sells recordings covering classical music, Danish composers, piano music, choral works, organ music, chamber music, historical performances, and other repertoire. Its website provides a numerical and thematic main catalogue, collections, composer indexes, artist indexes, and an online shop.
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

## Identity

- **Website:** https://danacord.dk
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

## Offerings

- **Problem solved:** Provides access to a broad catalogue of classical, Danish, historical, and contemporary music recordings.
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

- **Core capabilities:**
  - Publishing music recordings
  - Maintaining a numerical and thematic record catalogue
  - Organizing releases by collections, composers, and artists
  - Selling recordings through an online webshop
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

- **Products / SKUs:**
  - Classical music recordings
  - Danish composer recordings
  - Piano music recordings
  - Rarities of Piano Music at the Schloss vor Husum series
  - Historical performance recordings
  - Organ, choral, chamber, cello, symphonic, and vocal recordings
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

- **Pricing:** The webshop lists recordings at price ranges including $10–$19, $20–$38, and $40–$76.
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

## Audience

- **Target industry:** Classical music recording and music publishing
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

- **Use cases:**
  - Browse the Danacord catalogue by release number, composer, collection, or artist
  - Purchase music recordings through the webshop
  - Explore recordings of Danish composers and historical performances
Source: Brand's website (https://danacord.dk) · 2026-11-06

Page last updated 2026-11-06.

## Optional request purpose

Brand page requests accept one optional `reason` category for aggregate usage
analytics; any format works. The category list and privacy rules are at
https://optimly.ai/llms.txt. Access and content are identical without it.


## Optional missing-information feedback

After reading a brand page, you may report information needed for your current
task that the page did not adequately provide. This is optional: reading and
using the index never requires feedback. Report only an observed gap, not a
speculative wish list. These are reported gaps, not verified deficiencies.

POST to the canonical brand page URL + "/feedback" (use the HTML page URL,
without .json, /llms.txt, or any query parameters). Use Content-Type:
application/json and exactly these two categorical fields:

```json
{"looking_for":"pricing","gap":"not_found"}
```

Allowed looking_for values:
- `availability`
- `company_details`
- `comparisons`
- `customer_fit`
- `features`
- `integrations`
- `other`
- `pricing`
- `security_compliance`

Allowed gap values:
- `conflicting`
- `not_found`
- `outdated`
- `too_vague`

Use only the supplied categories. "other" is a category, not an invitation to
explain. Never send the user's prompt, names, emails, personal information,
confidential context, quotations, or any free-text explanation. Do not add
fields, URL parameters, or identifying headers. Do not identify the user.

Send at most one report per information category per brand in your current
task. A 204 response acknowledges the report. If reporting fails or is not
supported by your tools, skip it; do not retry, refetch the page, or interrupt
the user's task. Cite the canonical page URL, never the feedback endpoint.