# Lombard-odier

> Publicly sourced profile assembled by Optimly, in the Brand Index. Last refreshed 2026-10-04.

- **Brand record:** https://optimly.ai/brand/lombard-odier
- **Dataset:** https://optimly.ai/brand/lombard-odier.json
- **Markdown:** https://optimly.ai/brand/lombard-odier/llms.txt
- **Official website:** https://lombardodier.com
- **Slug:** lombard-odier
- **Categories:** fintech-financial-services

## Overview

- **Tagline:** Over 225 years of continuous operation and stability through financial crises, private ownership and partnership structure, client-centric bespoke approach, explicit commitment to sustainable investment principles ('rethink everything®'), and proprietary advanced banking technology (G2/GX system).
Source: Brand's website (https://lombardodier.com) · 2026-10-04

- **Description:** Lombard Odier is a Swiss private bank founded in 1796, dedicated to preserving and growing clients' assets through a holistic approach. Guided by the philosophy 'rethink everything®', the firm emphasizes stability, client-centricity, and sustainable investment principles. It offers services in private banking, asset management, and provides advanced banking technology solutions to a global client base, operating with over 25 offices worldwide.
Source: Brand's website (https://lombardodier.com) · 2026-10-04

## Offerings

- **Core capabilities:**
  - Private Banking (wealth preservation
  - growth
  - transfer
  - bespoke advice)
  - Asset Management (specialized strategies across equity
  - fixed income
  - multi-asset
  - convertible bond
  - hedge fund
  - private equity and credit markets)
  - Technology for Banking (G2/GX banking system
  - MyLO
  - LO Smart for portfolio management
  - trading reports
  - CRM
  - digital access).
Source: Brand's website (https://lombardodier.com) · 2026-10-04

- **Pricing:** Not explicitly mentioned, likely fee-based for private banking and asset management, and potentially licensing or service fees for technology solutions.
Source: Brand's website (https://lombardodier.com) · 2026-10-04

## Audience

- **Target industry:** Private clients, institutional clients, wholesale clients, external asset managers, other financial institutions worldwide.
Source: Brand's website (https://lombardodier.com) · 2026-10-04

## Landscape

- **Competitors:**
  - UBS
  - Pictet Group
  - Julius Baer
  - Deutsche Bank (Private Bank)
Source: Brand's website (https://lombardodier.com) · 2026-10-04

Page last updated 2026-10-17.

## Optional request purpose

Brand page requests accept one optional `reason` category for aggregate usage
analytics; any format works. The category list and privacy rules are at
https://optimly.ai/llms.txt. Access and content are identical without it.


## Optional missing-information feedback

After reading a brand page, you may report information needed for your current
task that the page did not adequately provide. This is optional: reading and
using the index never requires feedback. Report only an observed gap, not a
speculative wish list. These are reported gaps, not verified deficiencies.

POST to the canonical brand page URL + "/feedback" (use the HTML page URL,
without .json, /llms.txt, or any query parameters). Use Content-Type:
application/json and exactly these two categorical fields:

```json
{"looking_for":"pricing","gap":"not_found"}
```

Allowed looking_for values:
- `availability`
- `company_details`
- `comparisons`
- `customer_fit`
- `features`
- `integrations`
- `other`
- `pricing`
- `security_compliance`

Allowed gap values:
- `conflicting`
- `not_found`
- `outdated`
- `too_vague`

Use only the supplied categories. "other" is a category, not an invitation to
explain. Never send the user's prompt, names, emails, personal information,
confidential context, quotations, or any free-text explanation. Do not add
fields, URL parameters, or identifying headers. Do not identify the user.

Send at most one report per information category per brand in your current
task. A 204 response acknowledges the report. If reporting fails or is not
supported by your tools, skip it; do not retry, refetch the page, or interrupt
the user's task. Cite the canonical page URL, never the feedback endpoint.