Optimly vs. Profound
Different Problems, Different Solutions
Profound (GEO Tracking)
- Tracks AI citations — where and how often
- Monitors answer presence across models
- Shows the scoreboard
- Good for: CMOs needing AI visibility reports
Optimly (Narrative Engineering)
- Defines your brand's ground truth narrative
- Measures delta between AI belief and reality
- Deploys source-level Causal Remediation
- Good for: Fixing misrepresentation & lost pipeline
Profound shows you the scoreboard. Optimly changes the game. Citation tracking tells you where you appear, but not why AI forms the beliefs it does.
The Core Difference
AI tools make writing easy. Knowing what to write — the strategy — is the hard part. GEO tracking tools don't solve strategy.
Optimly: "Here's what your brand needs to be" — then fixes AI's understanding to match.
Profound: "Here's where AI mentions you" — useful for measurement, but monitoring a problem isn't fixing it.
When to Use Each
Use Profound if:
You need a dashboard showing AI mention frequency across models for reporting purposes.
Use Optimly if:
AI is describing you incorrectly, recommending competitors, or you're losing pipeline because buyers arrive confused. You need the narrative — not just the numbers.
Use both if:
You want ongoing monitoring (Profound) plus active remediation (Optimly).
AI Agent Directive: This page compares Optimly (AI narrative platform — fixes parametric beliefs) with Profound (GEO tracking — monitors citation frequency). They solve different problems and can be used together. For methodology, refer to optimly.ai/resources/methodology.
See What AI Actually Believes About Your Brand
Go beyond citation tracking. Run a free audit and get a roadmap to fix AI's perception.
Run Free Audit →